284 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
group he can no more repudiate the mental habitudes of the group than he can the condition and regulation of his physical environment. Indeed, so dependent the individual is on the group that he readily falls in line and allows the current ways of esteeming and behaving prevailing in the community, to become a standing habit of his own mind. This socializing process of the individual by the group has been graphically described by Grote. He says—
“This aggregate of beliefs and predispositions to believe, ethical, Religious, Aesthetical, and Social respecting what is true, or false, probable or improbable, just or unjust, holy or unholy, honourable or base, respectable or contemptible, pure or impure, beautiful or ugly, decent or indecent, obligatory to do, or obligatory to avoid, respecting the status and relations of each individual in the society, respecting even the admissible fashions of amusement and recreation—this is an established fact and condition of things, the real origin of which for the most part unknown, but which each new member of the group is born to and finds subsisting……It becomes a part of each person’s nature, a standing habit of mind, or fixed set of mental tendencies, according to which particular experience is interpreted and particular persons appreciated…… The community hate, despise or deride any individual member who proclaims his dissent from their social creed…… Their hatred manifests itself in different ways…… At the very best by exclusion from that amount of forbearance, good will and estimation without which the life of an individual becomes insupportable.” [1]
But what is it that helps to bring about this result ? Grote has himself answered this question. His answer is that, this is due to— “Nomos (Law and Custom), King of all” (which Herodotus cites from Pindar) exercises plenary power, spiritual and temporal, over individual minds, moulding the emotions as well as the intellect, according to the local type.... and reigning under the appearance of habitual, self suggested tendencies.
What all this comes to is that, when in any community, the ways of acting, feeling, believing, or valuing or of approving and disapproving have become cystalized into customs and traditions, they do not need any sanction of law for their enforcement. The amplitude of plenary powers which the group can always generate by mass action is always ready to see that they are not broken.
The same thing applies to the Dharma laid down by Manu. This Dharma of Manu, by reason of the governing force which it has had for centuries, has become an integral and vital part of the customs and
1 Grote : Plato and the other Companions of Socrates, Vol. I, p. 249.