338 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
below of the assays of the Moghul rupees shows how the coinage throughout the period of the Empire adhered to the standard weight of 175 grs. pure.*
| Name of the Rupee | Weight in pure Grs. | Col3 | Name of the Rupee | Weight in pure Grs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akbari of Lahore Akbari of Agra Jehangiri of Agra Jehangiri of Allahabad Jehangiri of Kandhar Shehajehani of Agra Shehajehani of Ahmedabad Shehajehani of Delhi Shehajehani of Delhi Shehajehani of Lahore | 175.0 174.0 174.6 173.6 173.9 175.0 174.2 174.2 175.0 174.0 | Delhi Sonat Delhi Alamgir Old Surat Murshedabad Persian Rupee of 1745 Old Dacca Muhamadshai Ahmadshai Shaha Alam (1772) | 175.0 175.0 174.0 175.9 174.5 173.3 170.0 172.8 175.8 |
So long as the Empire retained unabated sway, there was advantage rather than danger in the plurality of Mints, for they were so many branches of a single department governed by a single authority. But with the disruption of the Moghul Empire into separate kingdoms these branches of the Imperial Mint located at different centres became independent factories for purposes of coinage. In the general scramble for independence which followed the fall of the Empire, the right to coinage, as one of the most unmistakable insignia of sovereignty, became the right most cherished by the political adventurers of the time. It was also the last privilege to which the falling dynasties clung, and was also the first to which the adventurers rising to power aspired. The result was that the right, which was at one time so religiously exercised, came to be most wantonly abused. Everywhere the Mints were kept in full swing, and soon the country was filled with diverse coins which, while they proclaimed the incessant rise and fall of dynasties, also presented bewildering media of exchange. If these money-mongering sovereigns had kept up their issues to the original standard of the Moghul Emperors, the multiplicity of coins of the same denomination would not have been a matter of much concern. But they seemed to have held that as the money used by their subjects was made by them, they could do what they liked with their own, and proceeded to debase their coinage to the extent
- Prinsep, J., op. cit., p. 18.