L. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 573
Act, 1936, by or on behalf of the employees of Federal Railways Between the 1st April, 1937, and the 31st August 1942, showing inter alia:
(a) the application number;
(b) the particulars of the parties, i.e., name and address ;
(c) allegations in the application ;
(d) amount of the relief claimed ;
(e) findings of the Authority, and qualifications of the Authority ;
(f) if appeal preferred, the result of the appeal together with the full description of the appellate court, and
(g) if revision preferred, the result of the revision together with the particulars of the Revisional Court ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The information asked for is not readily available and its collection would involve an amount of time and labour that would not be justifiable in war time.
11
*** Summons Fees under Payment of Wages Rules** for Delhi Province
2. Mr. Muhammad Azar Ali: Will the Honourable Member for Labour please refer to Rule 18 of the Payment of Wages (Federal Railways) Rules, 1938, and to Rule 21 of the United Provinces Payment of Wages Rules, 1936, and Rule 21 of Delhi Province Payment of Wages Rules, 1937, and state the amount of the process fee for summoning the opposite party by the Authority and by the court which is prescribed for the Delhi Province ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Government are advised that no process fee is leviable for issuing notices to the opposite party under the rules mentioned. This is, however, a matter of interpretation of the rules.
- Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. m of 1942, 24th September 1942, p. 507.