330 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Shri T. A. Ramalingam Chettiar (Madras : General): Hitherto you have had no consideration for those who did not know Hindi. There is a large number of them here and if you do not care for them and you do not want them to listen, it is your own look out.
Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava : I had already decided to speak in English and my friend’s orders are only supplementary. But after what you have been pleased to say, I will continue in English.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : Whatever has been heared has been heared in Hindustani.
Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava : I am not going to repeat all that I have said as it will not be possible. In future I shall submit to you what I have to say, so that I may not be charged for attempting . . . .
Mr. Tajamul Husain : There should be no repetition.
Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava : I do not want to be ordered by Mr. Tajamul Husain. If he does not want to ...
Mr. Tajamul Husain : I am addressing the Chair.
Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava : I do not want Mr. Tajamul Husain to make unintelligent interruptions.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : I am sorry that, Mr. Tajamul Husain goes on interrupting repeatedly. I am here to protect the house so that there is no repetition. It is unfortunate that we are spending much time in this way.
Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava : I do not want to repeat. I submit that the manner in which the Honourable the Speaker gave his ruling I respect it and I will not say a word against the ruling, though I maintain. Sir, that ruling is not the last word.
Mr. Tajamul Husain : It is the last word in this House.
Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava : I am not going to be taunted by these things. I think the House can revise its own order. I can quote a ruling to this effect from the book ‘Decisions of Chair. At the same time, let the house not think that I am asking the Deputy Speaker to review that order at this stage. I am not doing so. Let the House not be impatient. But may I ask where is the rule that a ruling once given cannot be revised ? There is no such rule. Since I am not attempting to get the ruling revised., this does not arise. What I was saying was that the ruling of the Speaker was to this effect that the Bill was considered along with this redrafted Bill not in the actual sense nor in the technical sense in which we understand what