Discussion on the Hindu Code after return of the Bill from the Select Committee (11th February 1949 to 14th December 1950) - Page 536

DR. AMBEDKAR AND THE HINDU CODE BILL 521

impossible. In fact, it is the beauty of feminine nature that they are so

different from men. It is the union of two distinct types that makes life

bearable and happy. So it is not by way of disparagement that I was making

this remark.

When the daughter gets offended with her sister-in-law, she goes back

to her husband and says “I want my share.” Then the trouble

begins sooner or later. It has happened in every home. The

12 NOON sister’s husband comes to his brother-in-law and demands a

share and it is refused and then he wants to sell the share to the brother.

The brother of course would not be willing or able to pay the full price

demanded, so this man goes to another man in the village and sells the

property for a small cash and a promise of more after the trouble is over.

Then some physical demonstration of new right begins. A criminal or civil case follows. From ordinary injury to murder, from registration proceedings

to partition proceedings and so on. Lawyers will be thankful if this Bill is

passed, because it will give them a considerable amount of business.

Litigation begins and does not end in five or ten or twenty years. Litigation

after litigation follows in bewildering succession and the whole village is

rent with party factions. If there are only several brothers, they can live

together and manage the properties together, although their wives may

quarrel with each other. Brothers hardly quarrel. In this way the Hindu

joint family system goes on. There is nothing inherently different between

a Muslim family and Hindu family except in this. Muslims have been

habituated to think of partition and individualistic life. The Hindu is

habituated to joint and corporate life. Probably, very few of my esteemed

Hindu friends can visualise the real difficulty that would arise out of the

daughter’s share. In fact, it is never a gain to the daughter. There is a

corresponding loss to counterbalance the gain. Suppose out of a litigation and a share a daughter is enriched to that extent. She goes to her husband’s

house and has her own sons and daughters. All that she takes from her

brother, her daughter will take from her sons. Instead of considering the

women individually and separately, if we consider her as part of family life,

then the gain is not counterbalanced by the loss. I submit that the daughter’s

share will introduce endless complications and litigation, quarrel and

misunderstanding and what not. In fact, it is my unhappy experience that

no prosperous Muslim family has lasted for three generations. This and other

things make them paupers. The point is not whether the system is good

or bad.