Hindu Code Bill (Clause by Clause Discussion) - Page 42

DR. AMBEDKAR AND THE HINDU CODE BILL 819

Dr. Deshmukh (Madhya Pradesh) : Easy marriage, easy divorce !

Shri J. R. Kapoor : In the matter of divorce they have easy laws in various parts of the country, among various sections of the people. Why should those laws be made more difficult ? On the one hand the contention of some was that marriage and divorce laws were made more and more strict by the Code and on the other, the contention of others was why should these marriage and divorce laws be enforced on persons who did not believe in them. My submission therefore is that this Code in whatever form it is passed, should not be forced on any particular section of the Hindu community, or the Sikhs or Jains. It should be left open to them to be governed by it or not. Secondly, some of the provisions of this Code—particularly those relating to monogamy and divorce, with which I am in entire agreement and would like them to be made a little more liberal—are so good that I see no reason why the Muslims should not be entitled to have the advantage thereof.

My hon. Friends Shri Sarwate and Shri Indra have moved their amendments. Particularly the amendment of Shri Indra wants that the whole Code should be compulsorily made applicable to the Muslims. I do not want that it should be so enforced on Muslims just as I do not want that it should be obligatory on every Hindu to be governed by this Code. I want that it should be open to a Hindu, Muslim, Parsi or for the matter of that any person professing any other religion hereto or hereafter, in fact it should be open to every citizen of India either to be governed by the Code or not.

Dr. Ambedkar : Great liberal !

Shri J. R. Kapoor : Not only that, I want that it should be open to anybody to pick and choose various parts of the Code. I am making this statement with all seriousness, because of this reason. There are various clauses in this Bill which should be readily acceptable to some but not to others, similarly there are other clauses which may be acceptable to others but not to all.

Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava : Does my hon. Friend contend that the choice of the person should be per clause ?

Shri J. R. Kapoor : Not per clause but various important parts of the Code. When I made that suggestion I knew that it may require the legal intelligence of Dr. Ambedkar as also Pandit Bhargava and other legal luminaries to amend the various sections of the Code so as to make them fall in line with my amendment. I am sure that this