Hindu Code Bill (Clause by Clause Discussion) - Page 472

DR. AMBEDKAR AND THE HINDU CODE BILL 1249

matter was raised in clause 3 it was suggested with regard to the definition of a son that an adopted heir must also be a son. When we come to clause 7 where the prohibited degrees are narrated, it may be considered whether it should be included, or an explanation added. Let us take up this when we come to clause 7.

Sardar Hukam Singh : I am extremely sorry that I have not been understood. What I wanted to say was this. I am only advocating that usage and custom should continue to override the law. In advocating that I am explaining the utility of usage and custom, the progress that it has made over law and why it should be retained and what differences there are between custom and other laws. In that connection I am referring to the son ; I am not trying to define ‘son’ or other people. That was my object. But, if the Doctor Saheb says that I should not continue, I will stop.

Dr. Ambedkar : I was only saying that we may discuss this later on.

Mr. Deputy Speaker : We may discuss that later on.

Sardar Hukam Singh : Then, I was submitting, Sir, that so far as custom and usage in the Punjab is concerned, it is recognised and well understood. It has continued to override the Hindu Law as was understood by the common man or even by lawyers and law-givers. There is no reason why, when it has been overriding Hindu Law for such a long time, has stood the test of time, has stood the test of scrutiny of judicial pronouncements and other tests, it should now be abrogated because a new law has been discovered and that is being given by another law-giver it should continue. It has been definite. It is reasonable. It has stood the test of time and has been uniform. As I have already submitted it is contained in public documents and can easily be ascertained. There can be no ambiguity about it. Therefore I submit that these word ‘usage or custom’ should be omitted from this clause.

Mr. Deputy Speaker : Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava.

Dr. Ambedkar : If I may plead. Sir, I would like this clause to be put to the House before we disperse, if the House permits.

Some hon. Members : No, no ; this is a very contentious clause.

Mr. Deputy Speaker : I am giving opportunity to the Members who have moved amendments. First Dr. Deshmukh, then Sardar Hukam Singh, and then Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava; there are then Mr. Naziruddin Ahmad and Mr. Jhunjhunwala. I am afraid it will not be possible with the best of intentions.