Hindu Code Bill (Clause by Clause Discussion) - Page 51

828 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES

Shri Raj Bahadur : The House had agreed that this Code shall apply to one section of the Indian people alogb ne. Can we now take a new decision that it shall apply to all ?

Mr. Speaker : It comes to the same thing. The objection is that the scope of the Bill is being extended now—that is the point of objection. Personally, I myself was feeling doubtful about the admissibility of certain amendments which are now proposed and which apparently seek to extend the scope of the Bill but I have not come to any conclusion. I should first hear Members and then decide at the end as to whether I should put the amendments to vote or not.

Dr. P. S. Deshmukh : It is quite open to the House to extend or limit the scope of any legislation. So long as any particular clause is not passed by the House, it is completely at liberty to do that. Supposing the original Bill says that the Code will apply to the whole of India and the House proposes an amendment by which it excludes certain States or vice versa ? I feel certain the House is quite competent to do so.

Mr. Speaker : The extension of the Act to the whole of India and then limiting it to a part of India would not be an extension of the principle of the Act. The principle of the Act is something of substantive law, which extends not territorially but in other respects. It is perfectly competent, prima facie, to say that it shall not apply to Sikhs, Jains or Buddhists; but the point is whether it is competent now to say that it shall apply to Christians, Muslims, Parsis and Jews.

Shri Syamnandan Sahaya : There are two submissions I wish to make.

Before you give a ruling I would request you to give us a little chance.

Mr. Speaker : I shall give members every chance.

Khwaja Inait Ullah (Bihar) : Are these amendments which are being moved directed to bring in Muslims also within the scope

  1. p.m. of the Hindu Code and directed against our Fundamental Rights under article 25 of the Constitution ?

Mr. Speaker : That does not arise. It is a part of the wider question again as to whether the Code itself goes against the spirit of the Constitution.

Khwaja Inait Ullah : It is clear ……..

Mr. Speaker : It may be clear to the hon. Member, but it is not so clear to me. Therefore, let us hear what the hon. Members have