33. Constitution (First Amendment) Bill - Page 406

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES 389

Dr. Ambedkar: I contend that these amendments are purely formal and consequential. There is nothing which raises the question of substance. However, if Members think that they need some time, I have no objection to the matter being taken up tomorrow subject to the other business of Government.

The Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs (Shri Satya Narayan Sinha) : The next item on the agenda may be taken up.

Mr. Chairman: I quite see the reasonableness of the request.

*[For text of the motions See Appendix XXXIII, Annexure 4.]

M ADHYA P RADESH O RDER

Shri M. A. Hassan Madhya Pradesh) : I beg to move:

[For text of the motions see Appendix XXXIII, Annexure 4]

The Minister of Law (Dr. Ambedkar): I beg to move :

[For text of the motions see Appendix XXXIII, Annexure 4]

U TTAR P RADESH O RDER

Pandit Balkrishna Sharma (Uttar Pradesh) : I beg to move:

[For text of the motions see Appendix XXXIII, Annexure 4]

Mr. Speaker: I do not know what the Government proposes to do about the motions in respect of the U. P. Order. The motions have to be moved to-day.

Dr. Ambedkar: I am in a difficult situation, because the revised order is not yet ready.

Mr. Speaker: Will it be ready by one o’clock to-day ?

Dr. Ambedkar: We are trying our best and I shall let the House know and let you also know before one o’clock how the position stands.