414 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
That in motion No. 2, at page 1 of the List, the entries relating to “Almora District (West)- cum -Garhwal District (East) ” be deleted.
That in motion No. 2, At page 2, the following be deleted.
(i) The entries relating to “Kanpur District (North)-cumFarrukhabad District (South-East)- cum -Tehsil Etawah District (East)” to the two places where they occur.
(ii) The entries relating to “Etawah District (West)”.
(iii) The entries relating to “Kanpur District (South)”
That in motion No. 7, at page 6 of the List, the entries relating to “Kanpur City (South)”, “Kanpur (Central)”, “Ghatampur (West)- cum -Bhognipur (East) “and “Bhognipur (South-East)-cumAkbarpur (South) “be deleted.
That in motion No. 8, in the Appendix, item No. 17-A relating to Patwari circles of Meerut. Pargana be omitted.
I withdraw amendment No. 3 in List No. 9.
Amendment No. 3 in List No. 9 was, by leave, withdrawn.
Mr. Speaker: So I am taking all of them together. Do the hon. Members wish to take any one of them independently ? If that is so I have no objecrion.
Pandit Kunzru (Uttar Pradesh): I want to know what is the principle on which all these amendments have been accepted. I find that one of the amendments has been tabled by a member of the Committee, Shri T. N. Singh. I would, in particular like to know what that amendment is.
Dr. Ambedkar: Those amendments on which there was general agreement were accepted. In regard to the particular amendment referred to by the hon. Member it is No. 14 in list No. 8.
Pandit Kunzru : My Hon. friend Dr. Ambedkar says that those amendments have been accepted about which there was general agreement. I do not know what he means by “general agreement”. If he meant among the members of the majority party, obviously there could have been agreement on many other points. If that was the only basis on which the modifications