648 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Pandit Munishwar Datt Upadhyay: This difficulty will be solved by the omission of the words “either of” occurring in part (b) of sub-clause (3). The amendment will read as:
In part (b) of sub-clause (3) of clause 35 omit the words “either of”.
Shri J, R. Kapoor: That would not meet the point.
Shri Satish Chandra: I would suggest the substitution of the word “each” for the word “either” in part (b).
Mr. Deputy Speaker: If it is understood that the hon. the Law Minister is also agreeable to this amendment, we can make it easy. Even in item (a) of sub-clause (3) we can say that the Chairman and one other member shall be persons who are either High Court Judges or who are in the list under sub-clause (2)(a) and one other member shall be a person from the list under sub-clause (2) (b).
Dr. Ambedkar: If the words “either of” remain it may be possible that both of them may be appointed exclusively from one list. We do not want that. If we drop the words “either of” then that possibility does not remain.
Shri J. R. Kapoor: Even then it remains.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: It does not prevent the Commission from appointing from either list.
Shri T. T. Krishnamachari: It should be one from each.
Shri Kamath: Instead of “from either” if you make it “one from each” it will be clear and free from doubt.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: “One from each of the lists”?
Shri J. R. Kapoor: So that the advocate must always necessarily be there !
Dr. Ambedkar: I have no objection. If people have so much prejudice against advocates what can I do ?
Mr. Deputy Speaker: I shall put the amendments in their order. I shall first put Pandit Munishwar Datt Upadhyay’s amendment. The question is:
In part (b) sub-clause (3) of clause 85, for the words “one other member” substitute the words “two other members”.
The motion was adopted.