PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES 813
obviously other changes must also be made. I am only explaining to my hon. friend that there is no catch in it at all.
Shri T. N. Singh: What about other places. There are also other constituencies in which radical changes appear, at least to me to have been made. For instance, against Banaras it is “Sheopur pargana and Dehat Amanat pargana excluding the Municipality and Cantonment of Banaras”. Again take them (v): “Jalhupur, Sultanipur and Katehar parganas of Banaras tahsil”. Formerly I think it was only Sultanpur and Katehar parganas. You have added one full pargana. I want to know what is the reason for this change.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: I will now put it to the House.
The question is :
That the following modifications b made in the Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies (Uttar Pradesh) (Amendment) Order, 1951 laid on the Table on the 20th September
1951, namely:
(1) That at page 1, in para. 2 (ii), after the words “but including Mohammadi.” the words “Atwa Piparia,” be inserted.
(2) That at page 1, in para. 2 (iii), after the bracket and words “(excluding Mohammadi,” the words “Atwa Piparia.” be inserted.
(3) That at page 2, in para. 3 (i), in the Table for the entry (North) cum Chamoli (East)” in column 1, the following entry be substituted ; namely:—
“Pauri (South) cum Chamoli (East)”
“(iiia) for the entries “Mohammadi (West)” and “Mohammadi (East)” in column 1, and for the entries against them in column
2, the following entries be substituted, namely:—
1 2
Mohammadi (West) … Mohammadi, Atwa Piparia Magadpur and Pasgawan Parganas of Mohammadi tahsil.
Mohammadi (East) … Mohammadi, tahsil (excluding Mohammadi atwa Pipardia, Magadpur and Pasgawan Parganas.
The motion was adopted.