DR. AMBEDKAR AND THE HINDU CODE BILL 1179
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is:
After part (d) of sub-clause (1) of clause 2, add:
“(e) to a Muslim or Christian converted from Budhism, Jainism, Sikhism or Hinduism in his life time.”
The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is:
Omit part (b) of sub-clause (1) of clause 2.
The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : Amendment No. 274, which also stands in the name of Mr. Naziruddin Ahmad is the same as the one just now negatived by the House. That need not be put.
Then, the question is:
For part (b) of sub-clause (1) of clause 2, substitute :
“(b) to any person who is a Jaina by religion.”
The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is :
In part (b) of sub-clause (1) of clause 2, for “Jaina or Sikh” substitute ; “or Jaina”.
The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : Amendments Nos. 101 and 102 are only earlier amendments which are the same as the amendments which have been just now negatived by the House. I need not put them.
The question is :
In part (b) of sub-clause (1) of clause 2, omit “or Sikh”.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The queston is:
In Clause 2, omit “Sikh”, wherever it occurs.
The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is:
In part (c) (i) of sub-clause (1) after “illegitimate” insert: “who, if he has attained the age of eighteen years, is himself a Hindu and”
The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is:
In part (c) (ii) of sub-clause (1) of clause 2, after “belongs or belonged” insert “and who, if he has attained the age of eighteen years, is himself Hindu”.
The motion was negatived.
[1-00 P . M .]
Mr. Deputy Speaker : Amendment No. 277 is barred by a previous amendment and therefore need not be put.