1180 DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES
Shri J. R. Kapoor : My next amendment deserves acceptance. It is an improvement in the language.
Dr. Ambedkar : I will improve my own language.
Pandit Thakur Das Bhargave : It is only a grammatical change. Instead of the present alone it seeks to include the past also.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The wording in the clause relates to the present. There is a difference. It is not a formal amendment.
The question is :
In Part (c) (i) of sub-Clause (1) of clause 2, after “parents are” insert “or have been”.
The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : Amendment No. 105 is covered by this and need not be put.
Then, the question is :
After part (c) (ii) of sub-clause (1) of clause 2, add:
“(iii) to any abandoned child brought up as a member of the community, group or family to which such parent belongs ;”
The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question : The question is :
After part (c) (ii) of sub-Clause (1) of clause 2, insert:
“(iii) to any orphan or abandoned child brought up by the state.”
The motion was nagatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is:
After sub-clause (2) of clause 2 insert:
“(2A) This Code also applies to any woman professing any religion who has married a Hindu, buddhist, jain or Sikh.”
The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is:
Omit sub-clause (2) of clause 2. The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is :
For sub-clause (2) of clause 2, substitute :
“(2) This Code also applies to any person, irrespective of his religion, who has been governed by the Hindu Law or by any custom or usage as part of that law in respect of any matters dealt with herein.”
The motion was negatived.
Mr. Deputy Speaker : The question is:
In sub-clause (2) of clause 2, after “Parsi” insert “Sikh”.